|
| If Vacuum cleaners lived up to their names they'd be some of the most dangerous products available to the general public.
For instance, Dirt Devil has a Vaccum called the "Extreme Power Stick." The last time I used an "Extreme Power Stick," I was playing Soul Calibur. Seriously.
Just take a look at some of these rediculous names:
Shark Handheld with Twister Technology What it's name implies:
 What it is:

Nilfisk Advance SS Mercury What it's name implies:
 What it is:

D-Devil Dynamite What it's name implies:
 What it is:

Electrolux Ultimate Canister What it's name implies:
 What it is:

Fantom Lightning
What it's name implies:
 What it is:

Hoover Savvy What it's name implies:
 What it is:

See? It's a crazy world of misleading misinformation out there. I actually find it pretty funny that devices used to clean things sell well when they're given such agressive names. "This machine will ANNHIALATE UNCLEANLYNESS."
I don't know about you, but 'Fantom' just dosn't strike me as an appropriate name for a steam cleaner.
I mean, how well do vacuums even sell? This level of competition seems almost illogical. There are more types of vacuum cleaners than there are types of pillows, and we use those every day.
Maybe we should step up the pillow competition. I took the liberty of making such an ad myself.

Dosen't it just make you want to buy a pillow?
Maybe if everybody was bluntly honest and titled all their products for what they really are, big buisness would start to die out. After all, it's the small companies that put out superior products.
I'm really sick of deceptive advertising.
Wouldn't it be nice if Mcdonald's ads consisted only of, "This is a hamburger. Though it is convenient and cheap, it is of poor quality."
Nothing will change, however, because the uninformed is still the majority, and the majority rules.
| | |
| Okay, I'm sure you've seen the new Volkswagon Jetta ads that claim Jetta owners are 110% more likely to do yoga, or some other crazy fuckin' statistic like that, right? Well, at the end of the commercial they listed a website, so I decided to go there. www.thejettareport.com
What I descovered was a hefty tome of knowledge that couldn't possibly be correct.
Here are some examples of statistics they provide:
70% more likely than the average person to be a Liberal 18% more likely than the average person to be a Republican
95% more likely to go see an action/adventure movie 74% more likely to go see a romantic comedy 93% more likely to go see a foreign film 79% more likely to go see a dramatic movie 87% more likely to go see a suspense/thriller/mystery 100% more likely to go to the movies in general
63% more likely to jog or run 98% more likely to have bought running or jogging shoes
90% more likely to have bought men's workout clothes 50% more likely to have bought a women's skirt
85% more likely to recycle 95% more likely to agree that people have a duty to recycle
97% more likely to take risks 105% more likely to be registeres to vote
Right. So not only are these statistics full of glaring contradictions, they don't make any sense. Who the hell are these people? This small population of Jetta owners makes up 2/3 of the movie-watching market! All these statistics are right there on their website, but none of the ones I grouped together were on the same page. According to their website, 100% of all the people having fun in this country own a fucking Jetta. Have you ever seen a Jetta stopped at a gym, parked at the movies, or even on the road? The Jetta isn't even a popular car.
And even though the Jetta owner is 102% more likely to agree that s/he should be unique, from what I can gather most of the people who own a Jetta are completely the same.
I mean come on, these don't make any sense! How can every single statistic be above the national average?! How can the average Jetta owner be spending 10000% more money than everyone else, wanting only the finer things in life, but still not have enough sense to buy a nicer car than a "Jetta?"
Because the whole site is based on crap. Of course these arent real market statistics. These are polls that you can take regardless of whether you own a Jetta or not. If the company wanted real numbers, they could easily have got them. Instead they implemented a superficial poll system.
So, you might be asking yourself, what IS the national average for all these things, and how can they possibly know? Well, they cited a website as the base source for all their comparisons. The Simmons Market Research Bureau. ( www.smrb.com )
This site is creepy.
" Our vast database, built from innovative syndicated and customized surveys, contains
the most detailed usage information available on over 8,000 brands, 400
product categories and every media genre accessible in the U.S."
This company sells statistics that you accidentially helped contribute to. They collect data from everything, ranging from the morally questionable (http://www.smrb.com/products_tweenz.html) to the shamefully distateful (http://www.smrb.com/products_gay.html).
The scary thing is that even I accidentially participated in this study. Remember when I worked at K-Mart? Back when I was a cashier I had to ask everyone for their zip code. Turns out that was for this. And it bothers me.
Fuckin' marketing.
I sent them an e-mail to tell them they should really slow down in their quest to become an omnipresant corperate god.
Just some friendly advice, y'know?
They never e-mailed me back.
| | |
| You know, it never ceases to amaze me how stupid people are.
Last night, I was helping my mother with her homework (pointless crap in
preparation for some meeting), as I often do, since she is, shall we say, not
good with words. Anyways, the really funny thing was in an article her
manager made her read; I saw this, and immediately cracked up;
“For over a century the machine has been used as the model
for organizations. The best organization runs like a well-oiled machine. But organizations
are biological in nature, not mechanical. The root for the word ‘organization’
is ‘organism,’ not ‘machine.’ Organizations are complex ecosystems that have
life within them, not Erector Set constructions.”
That’s right, the guy was seriously trying to argue that the
root of ‘organization’ was ‘organism,’ not, oh, I don’t know, ‘organize,’ as you might imagine it
would be. So had he used the correct
root of the word, he would have actually proved that organizations were like machines, rather than this
nonsensical point he was trying to make.
I mean, we could go by a dictionary definition of machine, which
is “An organized group of people whose members are or appear to be under the
control of one or more leaders,” which you would think describes a corporation like
K-Mart down to a tea, but you’d be wrong. It’s actually “a plant, animal,
bacterium, protist, or fungus.”
It really boggles me how someone of his intellectual caliber
could have possibly risen to such a high rank within the company. I mean, for
the love of god, the guy actually misspelled “following” as “folk)wing.” I
swear it.
I know I usually take these kinds of things out of context,
but I copied everything down verbatim.
| | |
| SPORE.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8372603330420559198&q=spore
Watch that video. I beg you..... This game is going to change games. From a single-celled organism to galactic conquest.
Unbeleivable.
| | |
|